Beyond the Spec: Building Real Trust into C2PA
A Content Credential is only as good as its ability to survive the platforms you publish on
Webinar · Roughly 40 min · Recorded 22 July 2026
What the session covers
Dom Guinard of SSL and Tony Rodriguez of Digimarc on what breaks provenance in the real world, and what holds it together.
A signed C2PA manifest proves where an asset came from and whether it has changed. The difficulty is that a manifest is metadata, and metadata travels badly: some platforms strip it on upload, and an attacker can attach a legitimate manifest to content it was never issued for.
What Dom and Tony work through
- A recovery path when metadata is stripped. Tony Rodriguez sets out the three components that give a signed asset a recovery path, including the Soft Binding Resolution API, which retrieves a manifest from the content itself.
- Where the C2PA trust list still needs to mature. Dom Guinard on the gaps that remain in the trust list and what has to close before wide reliance is reasonable.
- Whether a credential still verifies in twenty years. Both speakers on long-term durability, and the audience questions on watermark interoperability.
SSL's part in it
SSL is a C2PA Trusted CA and issues the claim signing certificates and trusted timestamping behind durable Content Credentials.
Watch the full session
Roughly forty minutes, including the audience questions on watermark interoperability and long-term durability.
Related products
C2PA Certificates
Sign Content Credentials that travel with every asset you publish.